What really stood out to me in this article is the comparison between the human and the mechanical. Vertov constantly compares the human eye to cameras. He calls this mechanical being the "Keno Eye". He says that this Keno Eye is more perfect than the human eye, and that while we can only do so much for a person's sight, we can endlessly perfect the artificial eye. This Keno Eye can also record reality in a radically different way than that of the human eye. I think that this comparison is interesting, one that seems very relevant in today's world where technology is surpassing humanity.
Vito Acconci Response
I could not follow this at all. It was like every paragraph was a brand new fever dream. In the first half I think I understood the idea that TV is a passive medium, so it's almost like you're streaming the thoughts of others right into your head. What about television distinguishes it as more passive than books? The visual element? And does it still hold true, is a TV show more passive (colder maybe, if I'm using that correctly?????) than say a podcast? Or a silent film? I was also following when we were comparing TV sets to paintings and sculptures before concluding that the set itself it more technology than are. I'd like to think we've surpassed that now maybe? If not then how could we? Then we started talking about sex, and TVs as sexless entities and I -
Comments
Post a Comment